The Camera we used to film our short film was called Canon X5. It was a HD camera, which meant that our short film was filmed in a high resolution. The camera was very easy to operate, which gave us more time to focus on other aspects of the film. While filming we were watching the shot we were taking through the viewfinder. The viewfinder allowed us to make sure that we had positioned our shots accurately e.g. during Max's diary scene we needed him to be in the centre of the frame exactly and the viewfinder allowed us to do that, because it allowed to position him accurately. In general the viewfinder allowed us to see every shot before we took it, which saved us a lot of time. Sometimes we only noticed objects that were in the way of a shot by looking at the viewfinder e.g. one of the members in my group was in a two-shot we took of Sarah and Max in the kitchen. We were also able to switch the camera's modes from automatic to manual ect. This allowed us to take more creative shots e.g. a close-up of Sarah during a scene in the kitchen in which her face was in focus, while the background was out of focus. The spirit level on the Camera also enabled us to make sure that every shot we took was straight. We were also able to attach a tripod to the camera, which allowed us to take more versatile shots e.g. high angle mid-shot of Sarah holding a knife in the final scene. We also attached tracks to the tripod and camera to make panning movements much smoother especially during establishing shots during the first scene (graveyard scene). The camera was also very easy to transport due to the camera bag it came with; making moving from location to location easier.
allow the titles to fade in and out; we were also able to control what time the title came in and left (mark in and mark out) e.g. at 1.18 or 1.10 ect. Adobe Premier also allowed us to add music on top of the timeline and once again we could decide what time it came in or out. We also used a Dictaphone to record one of the short pieces of music we got someone to create for us (Happy Bir thday on piano in the final scene). We were able to make the music faster or slower ect, so we slowed down the song at the beginning of the film. We were also able to mix sounds by placing them a little bit on top of each other to make the transition from one piece of music to another sound more natural e.g. from the short song Crescendo in the final scene to the short song of Happy Birthday. For the diary scene we used a directional microphone in order to record Max's voice and make sure that it was clear due to the fact that the first time we filmed this scene his voice didn't sound clear. We also used a boom mic to prevent and static or muffling noises in our film. The boom mic was supported by the boom pole that enabled us to hold up the boom mic without touching it.
The main online tool I used to begin with, was blogger/blogspot. Blogger/Blogspot was used in order for me to be able to upload all of my work together in one place instead of making it into a book. There are many tools on Blogger that I found very useful when constructing my work. I used tools like 'labels' that enabled me to be able to organize my blog properly under headings, which made it, look more professional e.g. I organised my research into the labels main task research (related research) and other research (unrelated research that was useful) in order to make it easier for bloggers navigate their way around my blog. Blogger allowed me to put posts up in order for me to be able to share my work with other people, who were able to comment on particular posts, so that I could take in their feedback. I also had the opportunity to use Blogger's templates or create my own in order for me to make sure my blog s uited the world of my film. I also had the opportunity to design the actual layout of the blog in order for me to be able to make my blog more accessible for me and the people who viewed my blog. Due to the fact that Blogger was on the internet I was able to access it from many different locations, which made it more convenient for me. Blogger also gave me the opportunity to use other interactive tools that enabled me to post work on my blog in a much more interesting way. E.g. I could upload PowerPoint documents onto my blog with Slideshare.One of the many interactive tools I used was Prezi. A Prezi is basically a zooming online presentation editor. I could create a whole PowerPoint on one page and I could add images and video's ect to it. This tool was particularly good for making presentations and pitch's in lesson due to the fact that you could include everything that you wanted on one page because you could enlarge or minimize writing ect. I used these tools to put a YouTube video into a picture of a mug for example. The programme was also really easy to understand and use due to the fact that there were different tutorials available for the various tools you needed to know about creating a Prezi e.g. there was a tutorial on effective ways to use zooming. Using a Prezi made it easier during pitching because we could spend more time taking down feedback rather than focusing on playing the slide seeming as our audience could see all the information on a Prezi without the use of a motion path if they wanted to. I also had the opportunity to edit a Prezi online with other members of my group who had a Prezi account, which made it easier for my group to work together because we didn't have to meet up as much, which was very hard due to other subject commitments.
Slideshare gave people viewing my blog the opportunity to view a normal word document or power point I had to be viewed in a much more interesting way on my blog and on slide share. They also had the opportunity to zoom in to the document if they couldn't quite see it. Slide Rocket was quite similar to both Slideshare and Prezi seeming as you could make a presentation online. It was similar to a power point due to the fact you could add transitions between slides, however Slide Rocket was more advanced. You could add a tweets feed to your presentation, so that viewers could see current tweets of a particular topic e.g. they could see recent tweets about a duck on your presentation. This programme also gave you the opportunity to record your own voice over a presentation in order to explain a slide or image ect. I used this tool to present my storyboard on my blog by recording myself talking about the storyboard. Like
Prezi you were able to add a live YouTube video to a particular slide, which came in handy e.g. I added trailers of films that were similar to my film in a presentation I made on Slide Rocket. All of these websites made explaining research and planning that much easier because you could support what you wanted to write with images video's ect. It improved the overall look of the blog seeming as these programmes were quite new and more interesting than just text. 
We recorded one of our pitches and feedback using the camera on our phones e.g . we took a video of a pitch we did in class and uploaded it to YouTube and put it on our blogs. We did this in order for us to have a visual form of our pitch to put on our blogs. We also used normal digital still cameras and the camera on our phones to take pictures of ourselves while filming and just in general during the length of the project. This was useful because it allowed people to see the process of making the film in pictures e.g. an image of two of us filming with the camera. I also used Windows movie maker to make a moodboard and then I converted the file and posted it on YouTube. I thought that this moodboard was more effective because it allowed you to talk about more. E.g. I was able to include a song in the moodboard that really did sum up the emotions experienced in the short film and I was able to explain why.
I used Google in order to find a lot of the images and websites that I needed / used for the research stage of my coursework in particular .e.g. I found a lot of images of blockbuster posters, like the film Seven Pounds for my film on




The costume of the actors followed the codes and conventions of other films because their costume was your everyday type of clothes e.g. when Sarah was walking around the house she was in jogging bottoms and when Sarah and Max were at the graveyard they were dressed in smart clothing e.g. black skirt and a suit. Sarah also only wore make-up at the cemetery in the first scene. In every other scene both Max and Sarah didn't wear make-up in or for them to look like ordinary people and also in order for them to look like they were grieving. The main setting used (a house) was typical as well because a house is an ordinary setting; especially for a drama like ours because they are usually set in everyday settings. The second setting we used (even though it was a school) wasn't typical of the codes and conventions because it looked another dimension/spiritual world even though it was actually the inside voice of Max. This went against the codes and conventions of drama's because this diary scene didn't look like an everyday setting. We also used a diary in this scene that Max used as a prop. We made the character pour out all his emotions into the diary. This goes against the codes and conventions of films because in most films Diary's are given to female characters as props because they are stereotyped to be t he more emotional e.g. like Celie in 'The Colour Purple'. Boys are stereotyped to be strong and not share their emotions, which is why it goes against the codes and conventions when Max has one. Sarah is seen holding a hoover as a prop and hoovering, which follows the codes and conventions of female characters in films and stereotypes because women are stereotyped to be housewives/do all the cleaning e.g. like the mother at the beginning of the film Ramona and Beezus. The lighting in the film is also natural lighting, which follows other drama films, as they are set or about real life e.g. like the natural lighting in the film 'Imagine That'.
We got important feedback during the pitching stage. This allowed us to able to make sure that our story idea was perfect. The feedback we received allowed us to look at our story from a different perspective. Due to the fact that we were the ones that made the story; it was really difficult for us to see faults with it, so having other people comment on our idea really opened up our eyes to the stories flaws. The original story idea was that we would show Max struggling at school as a reaction to the death of his father; we were also going to show the father. In the original story Sarah lost her Grandmother as well and her and Max argued a lot and she went back to normal in the end when she saw Max crying. During the feedback period, we got told that "this story was too long to be a short story". We also got told that there were too many characters in our story and that "Sarah's reaction to her husband's death was too extreme". They also said that Sarah had to see something more than her son crying in order for her to change that much. We decided to axe the character of the grandma and we didn't show the character of the dad, but we mentioned him. We also got rid of the scene where Max struggles at school and showed him struggling at home, which meant that at the time we didn't have to go to school to shoot, which would have saved more time. We let Sarah discover Max's diary instead which was more emotional and heartfelt; and we didn't let Sarah change too much. All these little changes made the story more realistic. In the end it had the potential to be a really good short film. From this I learnt how small the gap between a short film that is meant to last five minuets, and a longer film or even a feature film could be. Due to a few minor suggestions we were able to change this idea into a short film. E.g. the part of the original story where Max goes to school being cut made the film shorter and saved us time during the production stage, whilst filming and even during editing seeming as there was less to capture. If the treatment wasn't good we wouldn't have been able to move on, as there would have been problems if we carried on planning for our story e.g. we would have had too much footage to make a 5min film and it may have been too late to change that.
During the editing phase we got a lot of feedback on the look of our film. The part that we wanted feedback on the most was the final scene in which Sarah appears to be attempting to commit suicide, but in the end she was just trying to cut a slice of cake. Most of our feedback audience believed that she was actually going to kill herself, so we were really happy with that outcome. We were also told that Max's diary scene wasn't clear enough e.g. there were points in which his voice sounded like a muffle. We decided to film that part again. During the second attempt of recording Max's voice we used a directional microphone, so that the microphone would concentrate on picking up his voice alone. We also made Michael who played Max project his voice and we used high quality sound equipment such as a boom mic instead of relying on the microphone on the camera. Max's dialogue in this seen was very significant due to the fact that this is the only part in the film where the audience can find out that Max's father died and this is why Max's mum is the way she is. Unfortunately during feedback we also got told that Sarah seemed like Max's girlfriend or sister instead of his mum due to the fact that the actress playing Sarah looked quite young for her age. By the time we found out this information it was too late to change the actress and shoot it again. This is why it was even more imperative that Max's diary was easy to understand because it says "when you left, mum left with you", which implies that Sarah is in fact Max's mum. Due to this issue I learnt that I need to be more careful when choosing actors/actresses, so that the distinctions between characters are made clear. We also got told by our feedback audience that there were too many knife shots in the final scene and some of them were pointless e.g. there was once a mid-shot of Sarah from behind twirling the knife in the final seem that wasn't very good and had no use, as she was repeating the same action from two shots before, so it was too repetitive so we cut it out. 